1. Qt Signals And Slots Without Event Loop Youtube
2. Qt Signals And Slots Without Event Loop Download
3. Qt Signals And Slots Without Event Loop Free

The previous example shows one way that works across old versions of Qt published so far (Qt 1 to 5). Recently a blog post about porting a tutorial application from Qt 1 to Qt 5.11 has been published, and no porting was needed at all for signals, slots, or the connections! That doesn’t mean the feature is perfect, since a new way to make. Signals and Slots. In Qt, we have an alternative to the callback technique: We use signals and slots. A signal is emitted when a particular event occurs. Qt's widgets have many predefined signals, but we can always subclass widgets to add our own signals to them. A slot is a function that is called in response to a particular signal.

The main event loop receives events from the window system and dispatches these to the application widgets. Generally speaking, no user interaction can take place before calling exec. As a special case, modal widgets like QMessageBox can be used before calling exec, because modal widgets use their own local event loop. Signal/slot mechanism I The signal/slot mechanism is a core mechanism of the Qt framework I Objects can de ne slots, which are functions called in response to a signal being received I Objects can emit signals, which are events optionally associated with data I A signal of a given object can be connected to one or more.

Qt documentation states that signals and slots can be direct, queued and auto.

It also stated that if object that owns slot ‘lives’ in a thread different from object that owns signal, emitting such signal will be like posting message – signal emit will return instantly and slot method will be called in target thread’s event loop.

Unfortunately, documentation do not specify that ‘lives’ stands for and no examples is available. I have tried the following code:

main.h:

main.cpp:

Output is:

MySlot() is never called :(. What I’m doing wrong?

There are quite a few problems with your code :

• like said by Evan the emit keyword is missing
• all your objects live in the main thread, only the code in the run methods live in other threads, which means that the MySlot slot would be called in the main thread and I’m not sure that’s what you want
• your slot will never be called since the main event loop will never been launched : your two calls to wait() will only timeout after a very long time (and you’ll probably kill your application before that happens) and I don’t think that’s what you want either, anyway they really have no use in your code.

This code would most likely work (though I have not tested it) and I think it does what you want it to do :

Now MyObject will live in thread2 (thanks to moveToThread).

MySignal should be sent from thread1 (thought I’m not sure on that one, it might be sent from main thread, it doesn’t really matter).

No event loop is needed in thread1 since emitting a signal doesn’t need an event loop. An event loop is needed in thread2 (lanched by exec()) to receive the signal.

MySlot will be called in thread2.

Do not subclass QThread for Qt 4.4+

While Aiua’s answer is good, I want to point out some issues with QThread and Qt 4.6 or 4.7.

This article sums it up: http://blog.qt.io/blog/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong/

Lack of Documentation on Qt’s part

Unfortunately the problem stems from a lack of updates to documentation. Prior to Qt 4.4 QThread had no default run() implementation, which meant that you had to subclass QThread in order to use it.

If you’re using Qt 4.6 or 4.7 then you almost certainly should not subclass QThread.

Use moveToThread

The key to getting slots to execute in a worker thread is to use the moveToThread method as Aiua pointed out.

Tags: qt

EnArBgDeElEsFaFiFrHiHuItJaKnKoMsNlPlPtRuSqThTrUkZh

This page was used to describe the new signal and slot syntax during its development. The feature is now released with Qt 5.

• Differences between String-Based and Functor-Based Connections (Official documentation)
• Introduction (Woboq blog)
• Implementation Details (Woboq blog)

Qt Signals And Slots Without Event Loop Youtube

Note: This is in addition to the old string-based syntax which remains valid.

• 1Connecting in Qt 5
• 2Disconnecting in Qt 5
• 4Error reporting
• 5Open questions

Connecting in Qt 5

There are several ways to connect a signal in Qt 5.

Old syntax

Qt 5 continues to support the old string-based syntax for connecting signals and slots defined in a QObject or any class that inherits from QObject (including QWidget)

New: connecting to QObject member

Here's Qt 5's new way to connect two QObjects and pass non-string objects:

Pros

• Compile time check of the existence of the signals and slot, of the types, or if the Q_OBJECT is missing.
• Argument can be by typedefs or with different namespace specifier, and it works.
• Possibility to automatically cast the types if there is implicit conversion (e.g. from QString to QVariant)
• It is possible to connect to any member function of QObject, not only slots.

Cons

• More complicated syntax? (you need to specify the type of your object)
• Very complicated syntax in cases of overloads? (see below)
• Default arguments in slot is not supported anymore.

New: connecting to simple function

The new syntax can even connect to functions, not just QObjects:

Pros

• Can be used with std::bind:

• Can be used with C++11 lambda expressions:

Cons

• There is no automatic disconnection when the 'receiver' is destroyed because it's a functor with no QObject. However, since 5.2 there is an overload which adds a 'context object'. When that object is destroyed, the connection is broken (the context is also used for the thread affinity: the lambda will be called in the thread of the event loop of the object used as context).

Disconnecting in Qt 5

As you might expect, there are some changes in how connections can be terminated in Qt 5, too.

Old way

You can disconnect in the old way (using SIGNAL, SLOT) but only if

• You connected using the old way, or
• If you want to disconnect all the slots from a given signal using wild card character

Symetric to the function pointer one

Only works if you connected with the symmetric call, with function pointers (Or you can also use 0 for wild card)In particular, does not work with static function, functors or lambda functions.

New way using QMetaObject::Connection

Works in all cases, including lambda functions or functors.

Asynchronous made easier

With C++11 it is possible to keep the code inline

Here's a QDialog without re-entering the eventloop, and keeping the code where it belongs:

Another example using QHttpServer : http://pastebin.com/pfbTMqUm

Error reporting

Tested with GCC.

Fortunately, IDEs like Qt Creator simplifies the function naming

Missing Q_OBJECT in class definition

Type mismatch

Open questions

Default arguments in slot

If you have code like this:

The old method allows you to connect that slot to a signal that does not have arguments.But I cannot know with template code if a function has default arguments or not.So this feature is disabled.

There was an implementation that falls back to the old method if there are more arguments in the slot than in the signal.This however is quite inconsistent, since the old method does not perform type-checking or type conversion. It was removed from the patch that has been merged.

Overload

As you might see in the example above, connecting to QAbstractSocket::error is not really beautiful since error has an overload, and taking the address of an overloaded function requires explicit casting, e.g. a connection that previously was made as follows:

connect(mySpinBox, SIGNAL(valueChanged(int)), mySlider, SLOT(setValue(int));

cannot be simply converted to:

Qt Signals And Slots Without Event Loop Download

...because QSpinBox has two signals named valueChanged() with different arguments. Instead, the new code needs to be:

Unfortunately, using an explicit cast here allows several types of errors to slip past the compiler. Adding a temporary variable assignment preserves these compile-time checks:

Some macro could help (with C++11 or typeof extensions). A template based solution was introduced in Qt 5.7: qOverload

The best thing is probably to recommend not to overload signals or slots …

… but we have been adding overloads in past minor releases of Qt because taking the address of a function was not a use case we support. But now this would be impossible without breaking the source compatibility.

Disconnect

Qt Signals And Slots Without Event Loop Free

Should QMetaObject::Connection have a disconnect() function?

The other problem is that there is no automatic disconnection for some object in the closure if we use the syntax that takes a closure.One could add a list of objects in the disconnection, or a new function like QMetaObject::Connection::require

Callbacks

Function such as QHostInfo::lookupHost or QTimer::singleShot or QFileDialog::open take a QObject receiver and char* slot.This does not work for the new method.If one wants to do callback C++ way, one should use std::functionBut we cannot use STL types in our ABI, so a QFunction should be done to copy std::function.In any case, this is irrelevant for QObject connections.